On the other hand, if you’re looking for a single software to cover every possible need you have or might have in the future, then Cubase is a clear winner.
Something that tends to bridge the gap between ”jack of all trades” DAW’s (Pro Tools, Cubase, Logic Pro) and electronic music production ones like Ableton and FL Studio.īoth companies have a dedicated audio interface for sale that offers enhanced functionality when used with its native software, but you can use them with any other DAW as well. I like to think of Studio One as a more streamlined and neat version of Cubase. I have switched to Studio One after being an exclusive Cubase user without much effort, really.Īll the basic functions are laid out in the same fashion, and they both follow the more or less same user interface logic. Having laid out all the differences, I can now say that Cubase and Studio One are actually quite similar.
#Studio one artist free#
Studio One also offers a stripped-down version of their software for free.Ĭubase offers a free 30-day trial, which is slightly disappointing when comparing it to the 90 free trials that Ableton offers. Studio One licensing is pretty straightforward so that you won’t have any trouble in that respect.
#Studio one artist license#
You can only run Cubase on a single computer, whereas Studio One can run the same license on up to 5 different computers.įurthermore, a USB dongle can be a bit of a hassle to set up, and having to pay another 20 bucks for it doesn’t feel like a great deal. How They Deal With MIDIĬubase has tons of options for MIDI- from various export options to a multitude of MIDI effects.Īnd it comes as no surprise that Cubase has such a sophisticated MIDI system as it basically started as a MIDI sequencing device back in the day. The only major difference between Studio One and Cubase is in the way MIDI is handled. These definitely are not deal-breakers, but it is something to have in mind when deciding which one is right for you. Studio One may require you to reach out for additional plugins, although its stock plugins are very versatile and good-sounding.įor example, there is no Soft Clipper plugin in Studio One or some cool stuff like Mono To Stereo that’s available in Cubase. There is an insane sample library, loads of VST instruments, and editing tools at your disposal, so I don’t see any need for third-party stuff unless you really like a particular sound of some plugins. Having said all of this, yes, Cubase definitely has more things to offer out of the box.
However, Studio One in its fifth version isn’t much behind in terms of what you can do with it.Īs a mixer, I probably use 30% of each software’s potential, but some folks will definitely need lots of advanced features to get the job done.īut for most producers, the software has long ago reached a point where there is no need for additional options as there is more than we can chew already.
0 kommentar(er)
